Book Review: The Invisible Art of Literary Editing by Bryan Furuness and Sarah Layden

Today, I’d like to recommend this book to everyone who wants to learn about editing.

Bryan Furuness and Sarah Layden. The Invisible Art of Literary Editing. London. Bloomsbury Publishing. 2023. 152 pages.

The Invisible Art of Literary Editing serves as a beginner’s guide to the job of an editor: their daily responsibilities, approach to authors and manuscripts, and essential skills. The authors, Bryan Furuness and Sarah Layden, state in the Introduction that the art of editing is challenging to learn because the editor’s goal is to remain out of the spotlight and let the author shine instead. This book takes its reader through the editing process as a mentor would during an apprenticeship and encourages independent learning based on practical exercises —a mini self-internship.

The book covers the editing phase aiming for excellence, which includes acquisition, global editing, and line editing. It comprises six sections: Aesthetic; Acquisition: From Attraction to Acceptance, from Solicitation to Slush; Responding to Submissions; Correspondence; Case Studies; Test Editing: From Observation to Practice. Each section starts with a discussion part offering some tips, moves to show some real-life examples, and ends with practical exercises and questions encouraging critical thinking.  The examples showcase the editing process from a manuscript with the editor’s comments to the final published version. The Case Studies section contains interviews with professional editors and undergraduate students learning the craft.

The book is concise, and its conversational tone makes it easy to read. It doesn’t bore the readers or get them stuck with a complicated passage; everything is straightforward. There are many opportunities to engage deeper with the book by doing independent research, answering questions for consideration, and practicing on dummy texts provided in the appendix. There are many opportunities to self-reflect and compare your editing with the work of more experienced editors.

the book only covers the “Excellence Phase”

 As a novice editor, I find some of the book’s tips valuable and enlightening. It encourages the reader to pay attention to details one might take for granted and overlook. Moving forward into the book, however, I wished there were more straightforward tips and suggestions before the practical examples. It is a short book, and although this feature can be viewed as an advantage, it feels even shorter because the final versions of edited manuscripts, essentially the same text repeated twice, take up a lot of space.

Despite its brevity, the book showcases editing in various genres: short creative non-fiction, short fiction, novel excerpts, and even some poetry. The case studies interview professional editors, including Julie Riddle, Valerie Vogrin, Maggie Smith, and Mark Doten, who share their styles and approaches to their craft. The authors compare this section to the surgical theater, in which medical students observe the surgeon doing their job. Comparing your process as a beginner with an experienced editor can make readers more confident about their future editing choices. The editors also discuss their approach to communicating with writers and incorporating diversity, equity, and inclusion into their practices. The latter, in particular, is rarely revealed in detail by editors, although it is a heated topic among the writers.

an example of an editor’s comments on a manuscript

The book is also helpful to writers seeking to understand how publishing works. Writers can learn to differentiate between a novice and a professional editor, correctly interpret the editor’s intentions in correspondence, and even survive the slush pile. For example, the Acquisition section gives editors tips and tricks on writing a call for submissions that attract authors that match the magazine’s aesthetic and mission. Writers can learn to determine whether a publication is worthy of submission and, therefore, the writer’s time and effort.  In addition, every writer deals with editing in a specific capacity, so seeing what editors mercilessly cut out of the manuscript or find hard to work with can help writers submit cleaner texts. Editing with Lenses, a sub-section of Test Editing, is particularly helpful. This part suggests that one should limit oneself to one aspect of editing during each reading. Adopting this attitude can help many writers navigate the anxiety of the tedious labor of editing.

Overall, it is a great starting point for beginners like myself who want to learn the terminology and go a little beyond the surface of common knowledge about the publishing world.

Have you read the book? Would you like to? Let me know what you think!

chapter 4. avoidance

I have been avoiding writing for a while now. All kinds of writing: posts, poetry, short stories, and even university papers. Poetry comes easier because it is short, and there is no story or character to develop. But at other times, I felt reluctance and avoidance to put my thoughts on paper and dive into the story. I decided to make a list of how I avoid writing so successfully. What are the strategies that I use? I came up with a list, and the list following in this particular order:

  1. Doing other “more important” things
  2. Reading because there are so many important works I haven’t read
  3. Comparing myself to others (linked to n.1) – following writers on Instagram, watching videos about writing and writers
  4. Signing up for writing classes and workshops because I have to improve my writing skills before I start writing.
  5. Buying books about writing and never having time to read them
  6. Coming up with a rigid schedule for writing, adding it to my calendar but being so overwhelmed with the schedule that I never end up following it. Plus, there are so many other more important things that need to be done so -> number 1

Once, I do eventually start writing, I enjoy the process and feel content. Therefore, in my case, the problem is not the act of writing but the erroneous thoughts about writing – that’s when the loop emerges. What am I avoiding? Is it writing or something else? Did I need to pay 200 dollars for that writing course, or am I going to avoid it, too?

Do we really need a special place and time to write, or is it just avoidance?
Boston, US. Dec 17, 2024.

I believe I am avoiding responsibility and failure. I am avoiding dedicating myself to a craft so uncertain. I am deceiving myself by making it plan A because I am investing more time and energy into plans B, C, and D – more stable and reliable plans. The choice needs to be made, and not once, but every day and every moment. The way out is to consciously choose to write every day or at least every time there is an urge or a calling.

Failure, whatever definition you give it, is what every creative person has dealt with at some point. I want to address the following interview with Marina Abramović, not a writer but still an artist, and her advice to young artists. She says “ready to fail” (01:51) – a quote I am going to put on my phone background to look at every day. When you put yourself out there, whether it is on paper or on display, failures are inevitable. So, one has to make a conscious decision to fail, not just once, but at every step of the process – can’t develop an idea, can’t start, can’t finish, can’t express a feeling, can’t create a compelling character, can’t get approval from your readers, can’t publish, can’t make people read past the first paragraph.

These are scary things to deal with but Abramović’s philosophy is that you have to follow the very thing that scares you, the very things you don’t want to deal with. You must face your fear and you must be present, letting it permeate your body and mind, letting it happen. Otherwise, no creativity is possible.

Ultimately, hiding behind avoidance is our old friend FEAR lurking from a forgotten dark corner of your mind.